Pdf version of the Background Papers to download

Pdf version of Background paper for motion 8 – received late

Motion 1 FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Please see Document AGM 14/18, the report on the three-day meetings.

Motion 2 FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The considerable contribution of Rev Dr Ann Peart will be presented to the Annual Meetings, rather than in a background paper, in line with normal practice.

Motion 3 FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

The considerable contribution of Alan Ruston will be presented to the Annual Meetings, rather than in a background paper, in line with normal practice.

Motion 4 FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Small Congregational Status

In June 2017 Bangor Unitarians contacted the Executive Committee regarding voting and representation rights at the Annual Meeting of the General Assembly. As a “Small Congregation” they have no right to vote but can send observers. They asked if the rule could be change to allow them representation. They highlighted the lack of fairness in being denied voting representation when many congregations with a smaller number of members seem to retain their Full Congregation status and have full voting rights. They have been regularly paying an annual Quota since they joined the General Assembly and remain strong in their commitment to Unitarian values.

The Executive Committee considered the request and was, in principle, in agreement. They recognised that there is no mechanism to remove “Full” status even if quota membership is below the 12 required for admission as a new congregation to the “Full” status and that to do so would be a retrograde step. The Executive Committee has therefore presented proposals for Constitutional changes which would have the effect of removing the “Small Congregation” status and reducing the number of members required for “Full” recognition to eight. Transitional arrangements have been proposed to admit the two existing “Small Congregations” – Banbury and Bangor – to “Full” membership.

Motion 5 FROM THE FOY SOCIETY

Unitarians have long been in the vanguard of campaigns to promote equality in society in areas such as gender, race, LGBT. Hardly surprising, then, that the Penal Affairs Panel meeting at last year’s GA meetings and the Foy Society Conference in May, on the subject of Inequality in Society were both well attended. The PAP meeting was addressed by Professor Kate Pickett. She introduced us to the wide range of research evidence from around the world which supports the contention that economic and social inequality in any society is bad for everyone. Professor Pickett was joined by her colleague, Professor Richard Wilkinson, at Foy Conference where there was more time for them to go into much greater depth on the extensive data and analysis which has been undertaken on this subject.

Profs Pickett and Wilkinson are co-founders of The Equality Trust. This is a registered charity that works to improve the quality of life in the UK by reducing economic and social inequality. As a registered charity it is completely independent of political parties. It seeks to achieve its aims by:

  • campaigning for changes and policies that can reduce inequality.
  • informing the public and politicians about the damage caused by inequality, supported by the best and latest data and research available.
  • co-operating with organisations and groups from across our society including businesses, trade unions, charities and others to prioritise inequality reduction.

Recent revelations about high salaries and bonuses paid to the likes of university vice-chancellors and company executives have reinforced the Trust’s finding that the UK has a very high level of income inequality compared to other developed countries. There is a wealth of data on the Trust’s website – www.equalitytrust.org.uk – which demonstrates how this conclusion was arrived at and the damaging consequences of it.

Becoming an Affiliated organisation would give the GA direct access to research teams, publications, affiliates-only briefings and networking events and a listing on the Trust’s website linked to our own website.

How much will it cost? Here’s a surprise for you – this motion has been fully and accurately costed! Affiliates are requested to contribute £100 per annum.

Foy believes that the work of the Trust aligns closely with Unitarian social concern and is worthy of our support. Affiliation would identify us clearly with the drive to reduce inequality and build a better, fairer society.

 

Motion 6 FROM FULWOOD OLD CHAPEL, SHEFFIELD

The objective of this motion is to allow the General Assembly to ask the Executive Committee (EC) to re-examine the conditions of membership. We assume that the EC will ask the Constitutional Review group to do this on their behalf. The motion is not intended to promote any particular idea for change. We very much hope that during the debate, delegates will feel free to express their own ideas about how this could work.
Membership of the General Assembly is determined by the Constitution. The Constitution says:

There shall be three classes of Full membership:
1. Congregations, Regional Associations approved by the Assembly, and Societies approved by the Assembly, acting through their appointed representatives, viz: one Lay Delegate from each Congregation having less than thirty members, and two Lay Delegates from each Congregation having thirty or more members, who have reached the age of eighteen years, and one delegate from each Society or Regional Association.
2. Any Minister, Lay Pastor or Lay Leader, provided that they are on the appropriate Roll of the General Assembly
3. All Honorary Officers and members of the Executive Committee.

Associate Members: All persons who have subscribed such a sum as shall be determined from time to time by the General Assembly Executive Committee to the funds of the Assembly in the financial year preceding its Annual Meeting shall be Associate Members and shall have the right to be summoned to its meetings and to speak but not to vote thereat.

Honorary Members: Any person elected at an Annual Meeting of the Assembly to be an Honorary Member shall be entitled to the same privileges as a Full Member.

For some time now, the idea of votes for Associate Members has been talked about, but there has been no progress toward change.

As the number of congregations continues to decrease and the number of Unitarian and Unitarian-minded people not part of an established congregation increases, it is not only sensible, but highly desirable to find new ways of encouraging new Unitarian voices and to devise some mechanism to involve these people in the activities and the decision making of the General Assembly.

Our existing congregations are clustered around large urban centres where enough people can physically meet regularly to share worship. There are many people who are not able because of distance or working patterns to become active members of congregations and yet they are still Unitarian and wish to play a part in promoting and supporting the Unitarian ethos. Today’s Unitarian Facebook Communities have more members than any existing congregation and it is inevitable that many new forms of sharing Unitarian beliefs and practice will develop in the coming years.

Rev John Harley gives his views about the future generation of Unitarians:

“In my twelve years in the role of GA Youth Coordinator I became aware that a growing number of young people attending our youth events were not attached to a congregation or fellowship. They appeared to express and explore their Unitarian values at organised Youth Programme events, mainly at the Nightingale Centre, and at peer organised events, many of which took place at Flagg Barn. They shared their Unitarian values and aspirations through social media channels and at events of their own choosing such as festivals; they made sense of their lives and built a sense of community through small credo groups and a spontaneous and creative style of worship often in a circle. Many young people want to deepen their Unitarian faith and witness without ‘going to church’ or belonging to a congregation.

However, as many of us know, our Unitarian young people have much to say about how our religious Movement can engage and must engage with society and with the important issues of today’s world such as campaigning for justice, peace and equality and forming a clear vision for the future. I feel that our present voting rules deny many young people the opportunity to take part in our Unitarian democratic processes or to have their voices heard at all.

I hope many of us are curious about how we can enable more young people to be represented at our Annual Meetings and how they can have their views heard and vote on motions without perhaps being physically present at our sessions. I applaud the EC’s substantial accommodation discounts for people under 30 to attend our Annual Meetings – this has encouraged more young adults to attend. But isn’t it a bit ironic that they still can’t vote unless they are delegates.”

This motion calls for suitable changes that will allow non-congregational Unitarians more inclusion, participation and representation. It isn’t just about finding ways to enable young people and young adults to get involved in our governance and our democratic mechanisms – it is about having a complete rethink in how we enable Unitarians of all ages to have a real say in the direction of our Movement by considering new channels and social media approaches.

A number of our key activists and movers and shakers do not attend our Annual Meetings for a wide array of reasons – from working or family life patterns, to cost, to maybe, dare we say it, our beloved conference failing to come across as appealing enough! How do we hear the views of all those Unitarians who don’t attend and all those who are not even members of our churches and chapels?

It is time to be creative and open to new ways, so that more people can contribute to the Unitarian cause.

Motion 7 FROM THE UNITARIAN WOMEN’S GROUP

‘Empty Pockets: Women and austerity’

As Unitarians, we are committed to the service of all humanity and respect for all. Since they have been in place in recent years, the effects of the government’s austerity measures have fallen predominantly on women. With this in mind, the Unitarian Women’s Group is asking for the backing of the General Assembly to lobby and work for change in this area. Support for women affected can come happen at local and governmental level, and Unitarians can make a real difference.

Unitarians have a long and proud history of supporting equality and, in 2006, the General Assembly passed a motion about equality for all. Women are bearing a bigger share of the burden of the austerity measures than men, and this is unfair. We are asking that Unitarians support women at a local and national level.

The Women’s Budget Group (WBG) is an organisation that scrutinises government policy from a gender perspective. In their gender impact assessment of the Spring 2017 budget, the WBG concluded that ‘Women and those on low incomes continue to shoulder by far the greatest burden of tax and benefit changes and cuts to public spending since 2010, with black and Asian women facing a triple disadvantage.’ In June 2017, Dr Mary-Anne Stephenson, Co-Director of WBG said “Rethinking austerity is long overdue. Women, and BME women in particular, have borne the brunt of seven years of cuts to public services and social security. These cuts have had a devastating impact on individuals and communities across the country, have increased inequality, and have undermined the social infrastructure on which the economy depends.”

Analysis carried out by WBG found has that:

  • Women are hit harder than men across all income groups, with Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) women particularly hard hit. Asian women in poorest third of households will be £2,247 worse off by 2020 (in contrast to 2010) – almost twice the loss faced by white men in the poorest third of households.
  • White men in the richest third of households, by contrast, lose only £410. Black and Asian lone mothers stand to lose £3,996 and £4,214, respectively, from the changes.

 

We suggest that:

  • Actions can be taken at a national level, to include lobbying parliament to highlight the inequality and joining with other organisations where appropriate to lobby for an end to these austerity measures.
  • Actions can be taken at a congregational level, to include getting involved in initiatives that support women affected by austerity. For example, congregations could host an event informing people of the facts of the inequality and raising money for their local food bank or Women’s Centre.
  • Actions can be taken on a personal level, to include writing to local MPs, outlining the facts, and asking them to work towards a more equal bearing of the load – or, even better, an end to the current austerity measures. Volunteering at a Women’s Centre or Citizen’s advice is another way of offering help and support to women negatively affected by the current austerity measures.

We hope all Unitarians will join us in taking action.

For more information related to this project, visit us at :
www.ukunitarians.org.uk/womensgroup

Motion 8 FROM TWELVE FULL MEMBERS & THE PEACE FELLOWSHIP

Why this GA motion is justified and necessary

In an urgent 2018 warning to political leaders, scientists and concerned citizens worldwide the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has announced that its symbolic Doomsday Clock is now set at ‘two minutes to midnight’.

These internationally respected nuclear scientists are particularly alarmed at President Trump’s irresponsible threat of ‘fire and fury like the world has never seen’ and to ‘totally destroy’ North Korea; the provocative launching by North Korea of intercontinental ballistic missiles; the perils of uncontrolled nuclear proliferation; serious proven continued violations of international law by the nuclear powers and others secretly developing atomic weapons; and the alarming breakdown in trust in international political institutions ensuring global security, as well as the additional grave threats caused by unmitigated climate change.

In addition to these there is well-grounded international concern at the plans of the Trump Administration to loosen constraints on the use of nuclear weapons and develop new low-yield warheads for US Trident missiles: which, military strategists  have warned, may make nuclear warfare not only easier to launch but more likely to occur.

‘The world is not only more dangerous now than it was…. it is as threatening as it has been since World War II’, concluded Lawrence Krauss and Robert Rosner of the Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Equally alarming for UK citizens is the declaration by the Prime Minister, Theresa May, that she would be willing to order a nuclear strike to kill hundreds of thousands of people.  During a Parliamentary debate on the renewal of the Trident nuclear weapons programme in July 2016 May was challenged by the Scottish National Party MP George Kerevan, who directly asked her: ‘Are you prepared to authorise a nuclear strike that could kill hundreds of thousands of men, women and children?’ May replied, without hesitation, with one word: ‘Yes’.

In view of these developments is it right that Unitarians should remain silent and inactive?

Why this particular motion now?

In July 2017 122 nation states, including the Vatican, voted for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). This provides the best opportunity in decades to advance the global control and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons: an objective to which the UK, as a founder signatory and co-drafter of the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty, committed itself ‘in good faith’ to help secure 50 years ago.

The grave dangers posed by nuclear weapons

Military and scientific experts have proven beyond doubt there can be no protection against the devastation caused by nuclear weapons.  Studies have repeatedly shown how even a limited nuclear exchange would result in dire environmental effects that would cause not only the deaths of millions and massive destruction but also severe economic damage and disruption to agriculture that would put two billion people at a grave risk of starvation. A large-scale nuclear war would of course threaten the very survival of humanity on this planet.

Moral leadership needed by Unitarians

In November 2017 Pope Francis, himself the leader of a global religious community of over one billion believers, showed commendable moral leadership in not only warning about the ‘catastrophic humanitarian and environmental effects’ of nuclear war and the very real risk of accidental detonation but also asserting that ‘the threat of their use as well as their very possession is to be firmly condemned’. Quakers have shown equally strong moral leadership in declaring that ‘nuclear weapons are morally and ethically unacceptable’.

We UK Unitarians ourselves in our 1982 GA resolution made our own moral and religious convictions clear when we declared that we ‘regard the use and threatened use of nuclear weapons as morally and spiritually indefensible’. If we are to be true to our convictions action is surely needed right now?

Appendix

Letter signed by our GA Chief Officer and other faith leaders

Successive UK governments have pledged their support for a world free of nuclear weapons. Today the House of Lords will discuss a United Nations Treaty that bans nuclear weapons. The Treaty is the result of multilateral negotiation and is supported by more than 120 states, more than 50 of which have already signed. Unfortunately the United Kingdom has refused to engage with the process.

Nuclear weapons continue to pose a threat to the survival of humanity. The Bible teaches us that we are stewards of the earth, with a duty to protect all life. Nuclear weapons are the antithesis of this teaching.

At a time when the threat of nuclear war continues to hang over all of us, the Treaty represents a unique opportunity for the nuclear weapon states to walk together towards a total ban.

We hope that the debate in the Lords today will be the first step towards the UK engaging with this process and joining the growing international consensus against nuclear weapons. Being the first nuclear-armed state to sign would show real moral leadership and demonstrate the UK’s commitment to work for a world without nuclear weapons.

We urge the government to reconsider its position on the Treaty.

Jill Baker, Vice President of the Methodist Conference

The Rt Revd Stephen Cottrell, Bishop of Chelmsford

Rev Dr Richard Frazer, Convener, Church and Society Council, The Church of Scotland

Derek McAuley, Chief Officer, General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches

Revd Loraine Mellor,  President of the Methodist Conference

Paul Parker, Recording Clerk – Quakers in Britain   

Revd Kevin Watson, Moderator of General Assembly of the United Reformed Church

Alan Yates, Moderator of General Assembly of the United Reformed Church